Category Archives: Democracy

The digital assassination of Julia Caesar

thought-police-2



Readers who follow Scandinavian affairs (and Scandinavians themselves) are familiar with Julia Caesar, an accomplished Swedish journalist who writes a “Sunday Chronicle” every week at Snaphanen. A couple of her translated pieces were published here at Gates of Vienna (and on this blog) several years ago.

Ms. Caesar writes under a pseudonym for a good reason: she lives in Sweden. The Swedish political-media establishment tolerates no dissent, and does its best to make the life of a dissident into a living hell.

On Sunday Ms. Caesar revealed that her identity and “undisclosed location” had been discovered by a pair of Swedish journalists, who have been hounding her for a year with the implied threat of exposure if she would not talk to them. The situation came to a head during the month of August, prompting the writer to take unusual and courageous action: Rather than wait for her tormentors to publicly expose her, she exposed them in her weekly column.

The two scribblers responded to her essay by revealing her name and publishing her photo in a major Swedish newspaper.


Read the rest on GATES OF VIENNA – 5478 more words

Rabid mob raises value of Sweden Democrat subway ad

sd-tourist-motherMother tearing down and spitting on Sweden Democrat commercials whilst her child cries nearby. – source: Avpixlat


The Sweden Democrat party caused an uproar last week (amongst the country’s left-wing extremists) when they organized an ad-campaign, aimed at tourists, including images of people sleeping on the streets and huge signs in English apologizing for begging in the capital.

“Sorry about the mess here in Sweden. We have a serious problem with forced begging! International gangs profit from people’s desperation. Our goverment [sic] won’t do what’s needed,” read messages on billboards above the escalators at Stockholm’s Östermalmstorg station.

The ad campaign was an immense success despite only featuring in a single subway station and costing a couple of hundred thousand kronor. Thanks is owed entirely to the looney left for causing an uproar, organizing, and sending a rabid incoherent mob over to the subway to tear down the “racist” posters

The advertisements were mentioned in over 1142 articles and 3619 social media posts according to the company Meltwater which calculated that the campaign ended up being worth approximately 52 million kronor.

Due to all the attention the ad got Kent Ekeroth, an MP for the Sweden Democrats was interviewed by the BBC.

The background to the commercial and the subsequent uproar is that almost every Swedish city and town has been flooded with organized Romani beggars.

Related: Sweden – A new paradise for Romani Beggars

Sweden Democrats now 2nd biggest party

screenshot-www.friatider.se 2015-07-23 13-10-06

Source: FT

According to the latest Sentio poll the Sweden Democrats are the 2nd biggest political party in Sweden with 23,3%.

Seeing as SD entered parliament in 2010 with a mere 5.7% this poll sends a clear signal to the government and the so-called “opposition”.

Whether or not the silent majority waking up and making their voice heard will change any of the destructive policies remains to be seen.

In other news, the Christian Democrats (KD) continue to linger below the 4% threshold required to enter the Riksdag.

Considering that they, along with the other Alliance parties (C, FP, M), have spent the past decade implementing population replacement immigration policies it comes as no surprise that betrayed voters are abandoning ship.

Related: The Swedish Media’s Final Stand

Sweden Democrats at 22,1% according to Sentio – almost 2nd biggest party

sentiojunesdSource: Fria Tider

The Sweden Democrats (SD) are edging eerily close to the ruling Social Democrats (S) and the centre-right Moderates (M) according to Sentio’s June measurement.

For Prime Minister Löfven and the Social Democrats the results aren’t that great. Scratch that. It’s a complete and utter disaster. In the 2014 autumn election they got 31% and according to this poll they have fallen by 7,1%. They are in an official coalition with the Greens (MP) and are passively supported by the Left Party (V).

The main opposition (sort of) also have reasons to be concerned. On the one hand (M) have increased by 0,5% to 23,8% but on the flip-side they are in a coalition called the Alliance with the Centre Party (C), Peoples Party (FP) and the Christian Democrats (KD). If the current trend is extrapolated to the 2018 election (FP) and (KD) won’t reach the 4% limit required to enter the Riksdag (Swedish Parliament)

(SD) on the other hand have every reason to celebrate. They have increased from 12,9% to 22,1% and if the current trend continues they will have managed to double their support in 2018, as they have done for the past 3 elections. But will it matter?

The answer isn’t clear-cut

Such a result would undoubtedly pressure the other parties into taking a more conservative stance with regards to hot-topics such as immigration, crime and begging but even if SD became the biggest political party they wouldn’t become the ruling party nor would they be able to pass a budget due to the December Agreement.

Say what?

6 months ago (S+MP) and the Alliance struck a deal known as the December Agreement (DÖ) which is valid until 2022. It allows the biggest minority coalition to pass their own budget with passive support from the opposition. That coalition currently happens to be Stefan Löfvens feminist government consisting of (S+MP). In accordance with (DÖ) the Alliance leadership forces it’s members of parliament to abstain from voting for their own party’s budget proposal.

What does the Alliance gain from the December Agreement?

Supporting the feminist left-wing government may seem counter-intuitive but the Alliance hopes that Löfven makes a fool of himself and proves to be completely incompetent thus reversing the roles in 2018-2022. So far things seem to be working according to plan but there is just one problem. If KD and FP do not reach the 4% threshold the Alliance (or what’s left of it) will be forced to support (S+MP) for another 4 years.

What is the alternative to the December Agreement?

To put it bluntly, a coalition with SD. This may seem like the logical choice but both the Alliance and (S+MP) have repeatedly and explicitly stated that they refuse to co-operate with them because they are “neo-fascists” and/or “xenophobic.” This attitude is understandable.

Entering into a coalition would not only entail reforming the most liberal immigration policy in the West but it would also mean conceding that the Sweden Democrats were right all along.

That wouldn’t sit well with Swedish voters who for decades been told by their politicians and the media that they not only have a moral obligation to become a minority in their own country don’t exist as a people and need to open their hearts to mass-immigration from Somalia, Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq.

Welcoming the third world to the Scandinavian welfare-state not only makes politicians and voters feel morally superior but is supposedly beneficial to the the economy.

A gift from god that just keeps on giving!

Dissenters have been and continue to be labelled as racists, nazis, or fascists so why would any of the two bloc’s come clean and ally with SD when only half of Swedish voters understand what the December Agreement is and only one-third can explain how it works? (DN/Ipsos)


Other Posts:

The indoctrination of Swedish schoolchildren

When Journalists Rape

Immigration to Sweden in 2014

1000-1500 war criminals hiding out in Sweden

The periodical magazine Advokaten (The Lawyer) proclaims on its website that it is the most important legal magazine in Sweden. In this years 7th edition of Advokaten the focus is on war crimes and how prepared Sweden is at dealing with war-criminals who seek asylum here. Nobody knows for sure how many there are but the magazine estimates that there are around 1000-1500 are hiding out in Sweden.

Only 4 have been charged so far in a Swedish court.

Professor Ove Bring is an expert on international law and is a professor emeritus of the Swedish National Defence College and Stockholm’s University.

He thinks the numbers sound reasonable and goes on to say that:


We take on more refugees than may other countries. There will be crooks coming in as well as refugees. We don’t know how many, but there are reasons to assume that many war-criminals will come to Sweden – Ove Bring


The magazine points out that war crimes are some of the toughest crimes to investigate because they have been committed in other countries some of which are still at war.


We can, for example, not send police officers to Syria to do investigations. It’s too dangerous there right now. – says Marie Lind Thomsen


The legal professionals working with these types of crimes are appalled by some of the atrocities that are committed but are glad that they get access to professional help once the case is closed and that they can help victims find closure by working with complicated crimes.

Police, prosecutors, researchers and lawyers all think Sweden has become better at dealing with war crime cases and prosecutors have been given access to international courses in cultural differences, “security think” and interrogation techniques.

The article in question gives plenty of room on how justice can be doled out efficiently via more employees, more resources, a special court and different war-crime laws but the elephant in the room is avoided.

Why does Ove Bring think that there are 1000-1500 war criminals here in the first place and why does he think that many more will come to Sweden?


The Elephant in the roomelephantintheroom

The article starts off by mentioning that approximately 54 000 people sought asylum in Sweden in 2013 and that 80 000 are expected in 2014 but does not mention the following.

I think the aforementioned facts are relevant seeing as a law requiring asylum seekers to have identification, only allowing real refugees and putting a cap on “lost” passports would mitigate the number of war criminals coming in.


Why were these facts not brought up by the magazine Advokaten?

Out of the 8 political parties in Sweden there is only one that wants to implement stricter legislation to hem the tidal wave of asylum seekers coming to Sweden. This doesn’t sit well with the magazine’s publisher, Anne Ramberg, who in 2000 become the first female general secretary of the Swedish Bar Association.


The Swedish people have voted. Almost 13% have in the parliamentary elections inexplicably enough laid their vote on the Sweden Democrats. In some municipalities and counties this quantity has reached 25% or more. Thereby the Sweden Democrats have a right to nominate lay judges to our courts and as the third largest party in the parliament traditionally hold vice-speaker post, which has come to be a part of the democratic institutions that are supposed to be the foremost guarantor of freedoms and rights. This raises many questions”


She goes on to bemoan the fact that Sweden Democrats have an inhumane view on humanity and that they don’t believe that all people are of equal value (the infamous faulty translation) which goes against the Swedish constitution.anne

Furthermore Ms. Ramberg argues that they will be biased and won’t respect ethical guidelines set out by the European Court of Human rights. She also paints up a vivid straw man argument by drawing parallels to the nazi-regimes race laws and claims that they will “rule by law” instead of abiding by the “rule of law”.

“SD are undemocratic”

If that were the case she will fit right in seeing as she implies that the century old Swedish tradition of lay judges should be removed because she doesn’t agree with their political views.

Anna Ramberg is one of the most successful and powerful Swedish lawyers but appears blind to the fact that she is inadvertently enabling war criminals to come to Sweden.

The periodical magazine Advokaten, is personally addressed and sent to each and every one of Sweden’s lawyers, jurists, judges, prosecutors, and others working with the Swedish justice system.


The voices of poor Swedes, immigrants and refugees living in no-go zones and multicultural areas are not heard by the powerful and wealthy who create their living conditions.

I think it’s time to change that so here are some quotes from real refugees.


“My cousin got married in Skåne a month ago, my second cousin from Södertälje was present at the wedding. At a nightclub afterwards he saw his brother’s killer, an al-Nusra member. Is that how it’s supposed to be?!”

“At the Migration Bureau, they have absolutely no control over who seek asylum here! The investigation goes in a flash, just like that, and you can cook up whatever lies for any story!”

“What’s with the Swedes? Why does not the government anything? Why are these people not in jail? Will they really get to threaten us and get away with it? Anyone wishing for an Islamist state in Sweden will also demand that we all bow down to Islam or die, whether you are a Muslim who refuses to follow the extremists, Christian or atheist. That’s what we have fled!”

“A fourth man joins. He is also getting a hair cut, but after a minute he joins the conversation. He came to Sweden from Syria a few months ago and says that in some asylum receptions there are supporters of terrorist organizations such as al-Nusra Brigades and IS. He says that both Boko Haram in Nigeria and al-Shabaab in Somalia has sympathizers in the Swedish lodging for asylum seekers.”

“Sweden must either keep close watch of the Islamists who come here, or close the borders completely!”

The full article from which these quotes were taken is found here


A wise man once said:

The mental blockage and severe denial that haunts the political class and the media elite probably stems from the fact that they live in ethnic white enclaves, far from the multicultural stew they cherish so much. They never wake up from gunfire in the night, nor are their cars burned. Their children go to nice schools where they never get robbed of their cell phones or hassled for being blond. When all you, personally, ever see is exotic restaurants opening down the block, it’s easy to be open-minded and all-welcoming.

The Sweden Report (?-?)


Other Posts

Asylum seekers now coming to Sweden in private jets

25 politically correct Swedish words translated to English

Is the Swedish media waking up?


Sources:

Click to access Advokaten_2014_7_72.pdf

http://www.svt.se/nyheter/sverige/60-000-svenska-pass-tappas-bort-i-ar

http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/nio-av-tio-saknar-id-handling_7936334.svd

http://johanehrenberg.se/nyhet/oklara-id-krav-p%C3%A5-asyls%C3%B6kande

https://www.advokatsamfundet.se/Advokaten/Om-Advokaten/

Snap elections in March have been called off

2014-12-22 – The mainstream parties have called off the re-election and have decided to co-operate until 2022 to permanently exclude the Sweden Democrats (SD) amidst fears that people will vote for them in the future.

According to Sweden’s Television (S(S)VT), the socialist government and the opposition have been secretly negotiating for the last couple of days. The two have traditionally been at odds but are today united in (mass) immigration policies and a fear of becoming redundant in the future due to the Sweden Democrats rise to power.

They are attempting to find a way so that Sweden can be ruled by a minority government and how a minority government can pass its budget. If they find a solution Löfven may decide not to issue a re-election. Then the government can keep on ruling, but with an Alliance budget during 2015 and the year after pass their own budget. The Alliance could over time benefit from such a resolution, because they want these new rules in place in the next election in 2018. If there where to be a shift in government the Alliance would be in the same seatS(S)VT reporter Kerstin Holm

These changes may seem shocking but earlier in December the opposition actually stated that they were willing to change the rules instead of co-operating with the Sweden Democrats.stalinisitsvt

Whilst S(S)VT prides itself on being unbiased it simultaneously states that the a re-election doesn’t help the current situation at all and that changing the rules, and calling off the re-election would be beneficial to both sides.

Perhaps S(S)VT is terrified of YouGovs polls which show that the Sweden Democrats are expected to receive 17.7% of the votes despite them airing the propaganda show, Blå Ögon, every week on prime-time?

The Prime Minister goes back on a promise… againimage

Stefan Löfven promised to resign if his budget didn’t go through but went back on his word and issued re-elections instead. He has thus far managed to spend 695 000 taxpayer kronor renovating his new home: the Sagerska Palace.

It seems the former-welder turned Prime Minister has made himself at home and if he has gone back on his word once why wouldn’t he do it again?

The agreement in question means that Sweden will be ruled by the socialists until 2018 and then most likely the liberals until 2022. The only opposition i.e. the Sweden Democrats have in-effect been excluded from power indefinately or until they get more than 50% of the votes.

How bad could it be?

According to one estimate 600 000 asylum seekers could migrate to Sweden in the next 4 years which is a mind-boggling 6% of Sweden’s population.

That would be the equivalent of Obama allowing 19 200 000 immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa to enter the states and receive full: accommodation, health-care, dental-care and education courtesy of US taxpayers.


Edited 2015-01-02: I previously wrote that legislation was changed which was incorrect. Neither of the two blocks that traditionally oppose each other have a majority due to the SD:s kingmaking role and the December Agreement ensures that the largest minority block will be allowed to rule on its own budget without the other block opposing it but it doesn’t entail that any specific laws are changed. Thank you Lawson for noting the error.


A wise man once said:

Democracy… while it lasts is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.

– John Adams (1735-1826)


Sweden is so deranged, there are no words to describe it – Danish politician

2014-12-16 – Politically correct Sweden is such a deranged society that there is no term in social science sufficient enough to describe it – argues Pia Kjærsgaard the Danish People’s Party former leader

In this article in Den Korte Avis, Kjærsgaard marvels at the fact that the politically correct are so desperate that they have graduated from using worn-out epiteths such as neo-fascists, fascists, nazis to comparing the Sweden Democrats to the terrorist organization ISIS.

That the Sweden Democrats do not want the most extreme immigration policy in the world and decided to force the current government to resign is something she doesn’t think merits a comparison to the Islamic State. She goes on to say that the Sweden Democrats are subject to witch-hunts and bullying the likes of which she has never seen before and concludes with this less than flattering observation:

“Some have referred to it as “DDR-light”. Others have called it a consensus society. Personally I do not think that the right word has been invented yet. Sweden is so deranged that it differs from all other societies in history, and in fact there might not be a social science term around to describe it. Naming Sweden is a task for those skilled in psychiatry who specialize in schizophrenia and the numbness of feelings.”

If our neighbors in the south think that terminology such as scizophrenic, deranged, and DDR-light don’t suffice, something has clearly gone haywire.


A wise man once said:

Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred.

Jacques Barzun (1907-2012)



Other posts:

1000-1500 war criminals are hiding out in Sweden and more are coming in each year

Dagens *manipulated* Nyheter strikes again!

“Open your hearts” (and your wallets) – Former Swedish Prime Minister; Fredrik Reinfeldt


Sources:

De politisk korrekte har travlt med at sige grimme ting om Sverigedemokraterne – men det er dem selv, der ødelægger Sverige


Dagens *manipulated* Nyheter strikes again

In the latest opinion polls the Sweden Democrats have reached almost 18% and journalists are getting desperate.

The latest article about one of the partys top men; Björn Söder; was given the provocative name: Jews aren’t Swedish/The Smiling Nationalism. To give off the “Hitler-Aryan vibe” his eyes have been photoshopped in one of the banners which you can see above. This is perhaps meant to bring thoughts to the the propaganda show Blå Ögon wherein the right-wing antagonists have blue eyes.

At the time of writing the article has 28000+ shares on facebook and 949 tweets. The Sweden Democrats are bound to lose a couple of percentage points and the media is bound to get more aggressive in the next few months leading up to the re-election. What did Björn Söder say to make this headline possible?


“Can’t you be both Jewish and Swedish, simultaneously?

I think that most people of Jewish origin that have become Swedes leave their Jewish identity. But if they chose not to it doesn’t need to be a problem. One needs to differentiate between citizenship and national identity. They can still be Swedish citizens and live in Sweden. Sami people and Jews have lived in Sweden for a long time.”

– From the article: Smiling nationalism / Björn Söder: Jews aren’t Swedish – Dagens Nyheter: 2014-12-14


The newspaper has been in the spotlight for half-truths previously with gems such as:

Immigration is profitable for the British(If you discount non-European immigration)

Earns more than half a billion on immigration(If government and county costs are excluded)

SD-proposal: Immigrants must swear fealty to the King (as a part of a citizenship test)


On a side note: considering Dagens Nyheters track record it was incredibly foolhardy for Björn Söder to answer such sensitive questions or allow an interview to take place at all.


A wise man once said:

If people in the media cannot decide whether they are in the business of reporting news or manufacturing propaganda, it is all the more important that the public understand that difference, and choose their news sources accordingly.

Thomas Sowell (1930-?)


Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_people

http://www.dn.se/val/nyval-2015/den-leende-nationalismen/

http://www.tino.us/2014/11/invandring-fran-utanfor-europa-inte-ens-lonsam-i-storbrittanien/

http://www.dn.se/goda-nyheter/rapport-invandring-lonsam-for-britterna/

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/tjanar-over-en-halv-miljard-pa-invandringen/

http://www.tino.us/2014/06/rapport-om-sandviken-invandring-lonsam-finstila-om-stat-och-landstingens-kostnader-exkluderats/

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/sd-motion-invandrare-ska-svara-lojalitet-mot-kungen/

http://swedishsurveyor.com/2014/12/02/swedens-stalinist-television/

http://swedishsurveyor.com/2014/11/15/one-of-swedens-biggest-newspapers-cherry-picks-and-distort-facts-to-smear-thirrd-largest-party/